By Andy Joel
This is an article about British Rail from about 1972 to about 1985, often referred to by modellers as era 7. It lists N gauge wagons because that is what I model in. If you model in another scale, I would be delighted to know what is available in it from that era.
- The TOPS Code
- Leasing Companies
- Further Information
- B: Bogie Steel-Carrying Wagons
- C: Brake vans and covered hoppers
- F: Flat wagons
- H: Hopper wagons
- M: Mineral wagons
- N: Non-passenger coaches
- O: Open wagons
- P: Private owner, not tanks
- R: Rail department wagons
- T: Private owner, tanks
- V: Vans
It is very much a work in progress. If you see any errors or have suggestions or further information, do please let my know (do please say if you are happy for me to use your text; be aware I may edit it to fit the writing style).
The TOPS Code
In the early 70’s, British Rail (BR) introduced TOPS (Total Operations Processing System), a computerised system for tracking stock on the rail system. This required everything on the network to be readily identified, and this required a classification system. As I am sure you know, locos were given a class from 01 upwards, DMUs from 101, etc.
All rolling stock was also classified, and given a TOPS code. This was made up of three letters, the first letter being the general type, the last denoting the brakes on the unit, whilst the second character was a somewhat arbitrary assignment of the subclass.
This was all rolling stock, so, for example, coaches were type A and N (N if not passenger carrying). The codes very much reflect the time, hence one letter for brakes, which was very complicated back then. I find it remarkable that the APT got its own class, L!
Here is the full list; only some are addressed on this page.
A Passenger-carrying coaches B Pre-10/83: Bogie steel-carrying wagons (Excluding coil) Post-10/83: Bogie steel-carrying wagons C CAx: Brake Vans CBx-CZx: Covered bulk-carrying wagons D Diesel Multiple Unit vehicles E Electric Multiple Unit vehicles F Flat wagons G HST coaches and power cars H Hopper wagons I Internationally-registered wagons J Pre-10/83: Bogie steel coil carrying wagons Post-1990: Private-owner bogie wagons K Pre-10/83: 2-axle steel coil carrying wagons Post-1990: Private-owner specialist wagons L APT coaches and power cars M Mineral wagons (excluding hoppers) N Non-passenger-carrying coaches O Open wagons P Pre-1990: Private-owner wagons (excl. tanks) Post-1990: 2/3-axle Private-owner wagons (excl. tanks) Q Departmental coaches R Railway operating vehicles (non-revenue) S Pre-10/83: 2-axle steel-carrying wagons (Excluding coil) Post-10/83: 2-axle steel-carrying wagons T Private-owner tank wagons U Pre-10/83: Uncovered open bulk-carrying wagons Post-10/83: Not used V Vans W Pre-1984: Containers. Later for specialised RIV wagons X Pre-10/83: Exceptional and special purpose vehicles 10/83-2003: Not used 2003-present: Special Private-Owner wagons Y Bogie departmental wagons Z 2/3-axle departmental wagons
The classifications reflect what was important to railway operations, so many different wagon diagrams might be lumped under one code as long as they are for the same material in the same form and with the same capacity and handling requirements at start and destination (and brakes).
Ensuring a rake of goods wagons had the proper brakes – and was marshalled to allow them to be used effectively – was something of a nightmare back then, and it is possible this was one reason BR looked to a computerised system.
Air Brakes and Vacuum Brakes
With vacuum braking, air is sucked out of a pipe that runs the length of the train (giving a vacuum, or at least a much reduced pressure) to release the brakes; to apply brakes, air is allowed back into the pipe. With air brakes, air is pumped into the pipe, giving a high pressure, to release the brakes; the air is allowed to escape to apply the brakes. In fact, in practice both systems are rather more complicated than that, but that explanation will suit our purposes here. In either system, if the pipe breaks open – say the back of the train breaks away – the pipe returns to atmospheric pressure, and the brakes are applied, so they are “fail safe”.
In the early days there was no train braking. It became standard for passenger trains in the pre-grouping era (I think it was a legal requirement from 1889), mostly – but not exclusively – vacuum braking. On grouping, the “big four” all standardised on vacuum braking; I would guess for the simple reason that a vacuum is readily created by a steam engine using an ejector, while high pressure is not.
However, air braking is technically superior, as greater braking force can be applied. For vacuum brakes, the best possible difference between on and off states is 1 bar, i.e., between vacuum and atmospheric pressure (in practice probably rather less). Air braked freight trains typically work at 5 or 6 bar so have a lot more force behind them applying brakes (passenger trains are higher still).
While unfitted trains (no continuous brakes) might be limited to 25 mph, fully air-braked trains might run at up to 75 mph. From the earlier seventies, BR started to introduce air-braked freight stock.
Speedlink was a wagon-load service BR offered from 1977 to 1991 (and briefly called ABN; air-braked network). It used exclusively air-braked wagons, so the trains were fast, and avoided some marshalling issues. Trains ran to a specific timetable between a limited number of destinations. Speedlink was part of the Railfreight brand (which also ran train-load traffic).
Railfreight had an evolving livery; originally maroon with the BR logo (which faded to more-or-less bauxite), then maroon with the logo and “Railfrieight”. In 1979 the flame red started to appear on low wagons (open or fllat wagons), and red strip over grey on vans, but only on new wagons at first. It would not be used on existing wagon for years (brake vans from about 1985), and red and grey for open wagons was later too. Railfreight (and Freightliner) became part of Railfreight Distribution on sectorisation in 1987.
Braking Types and Marshalling
We can start to get a feel for the complexities of marshalling a train when we look at the number of codes in use.
A Air brakes B Air brakes with through vacuum pipe F Vacuum brakes with Accelerated Freight Inshot (AFI) G Vacuum brakes with AFI and through air pipe H Dual (air and vacuum) brakes with vacuum AFI O No continuous brake (unfitted) P No continuous brake, through vacuum pipe Q No continuous brake, through air pipe R No continuous brake, through air and vacuum pipes V Vacuum brakes W Vacuum brakes with through air pipe X Dual (air and vacuum) brakes Y No continuous brake (for track machines)
A quick note about terminology. A wagon is considered “fitted” if it has either air- or vacuum-brakes, and unfitted otherwise. A wagon is considered “piped” if it has a pipe allowing the vacuum or air to be continued through it, but not the brakes.
AFI was a system that enhanced the vacuum brakes, but can be safely considered ordinary vacuum brakes for our purpose. They could be mixed with other vacuum-braked wagons.
If your rake is of identical wagons (or rather, the TOPS code of all the wagons ends with the same letter), there is no problem. just put a brake van on the end if the wagon TOPS code ends O, P, Q or R.
For mixed trains, it gets complicated…
Trains can have a “fitted” section and an “unfitted” section, the former being continuously braked. Either section is optional, but if there is an unfitted section, you need a brake van on the end.
The fitted section must be next to the loco. It will be either vacuum braked or air braked (you cannot have both), and your loco needs the equipment for that. Class 56 and 87 had only air brakes. All earlier locos had vacuum brakes; some also had air brakes:
Dual braked from build: 33, 50, 71, 73, 81-86
Some dual braked from build: 20, 25, 47
All converted to dual braked: 37, 45-47, 55
Mostly converted to dual braked: 20, 26, 27, 31, 52
Many converted to dual braked: 25, 40, 76
Later some classes were converted to air braked only (I think after this era): 20, 31, 33, 37, 47, 73, 86. More on locos here.
Brakes on a wagon can be turned off, so a fitted wagon can be treated as an unfitted wagon. In the seventies, air-braked wagons were rare, so the single air-braked wagon might have the brakes turned off and treated as unfitted, and the vacuum-braked wagons used in the fitted section. If you had several air-braked wagons, however, you would be more likely to turn off the brakes on the vacuum-braked wagons as they are less effective.
Your fitted section could have up to five piped wagons in a row, followed by two braked up to around 1980, thereafter the rules was only three piped and you needed three braked following.
BR-owned wagons were generally painted grey if unfitted and bauxite if fitted. This was adopted from LNER, who in turn got it from NER. LMS also had wagons in grey and bauxite, but in their case they were all grey, and then all bauxite from 1936 (though it would take many years for that to actually happen).
Until 1969, full-fitted trains required a brake van anyway for the guard to ride in. from 1969, he could ride in the rear cab of the loco.
There were a number of companies that offered wagons for hire, and therefore had their logo on the wagon as well as the company who owned the cargo. Information about these companies is sparse, so this represents my best guesses. If anyone can confirm or correct this information, I would be grateful.
British Railway Traffic and Electric Company (BRT) was (possibly) founded in 1907, and bought by Procor in 1974, but the logo was still present on wagons for much later.
Railease (RLS) apparently was a division of the Standard Railway Wagon Co. (a UK company that built wagons), and was renamed Standard Railfreight in about 1983 and bought by Procor in supposedly 1971 (but that last date feels wrong to me, and I am guessing 1986 or 1991). Not to be confused with GL Railease, which I think was only set up in late 90s, or indeed with the Belgium scheme covering the leasing of company cars together with rail transport.
Tiger Railcar Leasing (TRL) is most notable for the “clay tigers“.
Nacco UK Ltd looks to have been part of CIT Rail Holdings (Europe), and became part of VTG in 2018. According to Companies House, Nacco was established in 1989, but I have seen the name on wagons in photos dated slightly earlier. They had some connection to Tiger, and some wagons had both names on them.
Procor was a Canadian company, founded in 1952, but only named Procor from 1962. Railease became part of Procor in 1971. Charles Roberts & Company’s wagon works became part of Procor in the 1974 (and later part of bombardier in 1990).
VTG is a German company, best known for their fleet of tank wagons. I think they are still going.
Storage & Transport Systems (STS) was part of the Belgian CAIB group.
I think this web site was a book; very informative:
Another excellent site:
An amazing collection of photos of wagons; if you are building or painting models, you need to see this:
Different Wagons, as Classified by TOPS
This is a bit patchy, reflecting those areas that interest me! It may get updated in the future, as I do more research.
Note that a lowercase ‘x’ is used to indicate any or multiple braking types.
B: Bogie Steel-Carrying Wagons
Graham Farish do BDA and BAA wagons.
C: Brake vans and covered hoppers
This is a weird grouping! Why were brake vans mixed in with covered hoppers?
Brake vans were all CAx. I think they were generally CAO or CAP in this era, i.e., unfitted, but some with a vacuum pipe.
BR built many batches of brake vans to LMS and LNER designs. Both have a long wheel base and a veranda at both ends. The LNER design has a shorter cabin on top with a platform at each end, and is arguably the classic design. In the less common LMS design, the cabin/veranda is the full length of the chassis.
The Southern Railway built a bogie brake van in 1936, known as “Queen Mary”, for high speed goods trains (all other brake vans were restricted to 60 mph). There were also two-axle brake vans on the Southern Railway, known as “pill box” for some reason, but they seem relatively rare outside engineering use by this era. They resembled the LNER design, but with an offset ducket (to the left in the first batch, to the right in all subsequent batches). Some were built for the MoD, notable for the vacuum cylinders on one end platform, with two ending up on the London Midland Region (M360327 and M360328)
The Great Western Railway had a distinctive style of brake van, “toad” (though I have seen other brake vans also called “toad”), with a veranda at just one end, and the brake out on the veranda. A further 74 were built by BR, but the single point of exit was considered dangerous by the sixties, and this style of brake van got relegated to engineering use (the number of brake vans required dropped dramatically during this time). Some were converted to mess vans, with the veranda converted to interior space.
I get the impression that outside engineering use, brake vans tended to stay inside their region until the privatisation era.
Vans in engineering use would often have yellow ends and duckers, or wasp ends. Some had “ELECTRICATION” in large letters on the side. The “Dutch” livery, lower half grey, upper half yellow, appeared from the early eighties. Brake vans in engineering use seem to be ZTO, ZTQ, ZTP, ZTR, ZTV, ZPO, ZPW or ZXR. Some were converted to other uses, such as mess vans.
Graham Farish do LMS, LNER, GWR and both SR styles of brake vans.
Peco do some styles too, but they look like older versions (on a short wheelbase).
CBx were limestone hoppers, CCx were sand hoppers, CGx were grain hoppers, CZx sugar hoppers and CHx general covered hoppers (COVHOP).
CXx were gunpowder van – so why were they in the hoppers section? I think these were all inherited unfitted (which I find a bit scary), but some later had vacuum brakes. These were replaced by VEAs in the early 80’s.
Dapol do a grain hopper.
Peco do a grain wagon, china clay hopper (CDA)
These CGV grain hoppers were constructed from the Peco kits, which a good cheap source if you intend to paint your model anyway; they are very easy to build.
Blowing air through a fine powder will turn it into a fluid, and this was used in covered hoppers for cement from the mid-fifties, in two types, Presflo (comPRESsed air FLOw) and Prestwin (comPRESsed air flow TWIN) , the latter having two silos rather than one, and I think was for powders that did not flow so well. These wagons were designated CPV/W and CQV. There is a lot of information about them here. While some Presflos were originally in bright yellow – as per the usual model – by the seventies, they all seem to be painted in bauxite, and most had lost the board on the side indicating the company using it (these can be prised off the n-gauge model, though chipping out the glue is not easy; the earlier model is easier).
Later cement wagons were privately owned so appear under the “P” TOPS code.
Graham Farish do a Presflo wagon CPV (I strongly suspect the topless version has no real prototype)
These are the Farish model, with the boards removed and repainted. The lettering is a pain in the pain, with each letter added separately (transfers from Railtec). They were sprayed from about a foot above with white spraypaint to give the cement weathering.
F: Flat wagons
The first container train ran in the UK in 1965, under the Freightliner brand (which became a separate company in 1968, until 1978). The first wagons were 60′ long, as they still are today, able to take two 30′ containers or one 20′ and one 40′ (it is sometimes quoted as 63′, which I guess is the actual length, rather than the carry ability).
The NUR or ASLEF objected to the second man travelling in the rear cab, so for a while they ran with a brake van (or passenger brake?), despite being air-braked. This seems to have led to six “caboose containers” being built – a 10′ container that the second man could travel in (see here); I do not think they were used for long.
There is an ISO (international standard) for containers, and the original Freightliner containers did not conform to it, as they were designed for domestic use only. That said, the difference is in minor details like where the lifting lugs are positioned, and it looks like there was a 27′ version. Photos from the later sixties indicate trains were predominantly or entirely composed of Freightliner containers, but by the seventies overseas transport was becoming more important, and the variety of containers was far greater. See for example here (it is a big download, but this page has some interesting images from 1967; also tells you how to build a computer from a handful of resistors and capacitors!) and here. It maybe that trains for domestic goods tended to carry Freightliner containers, whilst trains to and from ports were generally ISO containers.
Until 1991, wagons were permanently coupled in sets of five, but thereafter two- and three-wagon sets were built, and single wagons (hired from Tiphook) appeared on their own in some trains. More here.
It is worth mentioning the issue with the loading gauge. Container heights vary. The original standard was 8′, but they got taller… 8’6 containers can only be used on less restricted routes, while 9′ are even more of a problem! The ECML was upgraded at the end of the 70s to cope with 8’6 high containers (leading to the Penmanshiel Tunnel collapse in 1979!). In 1998, Tiphook pocket wagons appeared, able to handle 9’6 high containers (but with reduced capacity).
The big question for modellers is determining what liveries are suitable for the containers. Obviously Freightliner, but there were many more. This thread on RMWeb is a good starting place for the seventies.
Also worth mentioning that occasionally tanks for liquids (and liquidified gases) can be carried. At one time (as I only discovered when writing this) open-top containers, tarpaulin covered, were used for grain, and later dedicated trains – known as “binliners” – carried open-top containers full of waste.
FFA was the TOPS designation for inner wagons in a set of five, and FGA for the outer wagons.
As a starting point for what containers are suitable in a specific year, this is a quick overview of some of the companies that owned them.
OCL (Overseas Containers Ltd) was a joint venture of British and Commonwealth Shipping, Furness Withy, P&O and the Ocean Steamship Company, formed to spread the cost of adopting containers, formed in 1965. P&O gradually took over ownership to become full owners, and the name was dropped in favour of P&O Containers Ltd (P&OCL) in 1987.
The confusingly similar OOCL (Orient Overseas Container Line), known as Double O CL, is based in Hong Kong, part of C. Y. Tung Group. It operated from 1947 as Orient Overseas Line, becoming OOCL in 1969. OOCL is a trading name of OOIL, which was taken by COSCO in 2018.
P&O Nedlloyd was a joint venture between P&O and Royal Nedlloyd Lines in 1996, and was bought out by Maersk in 2005, at which point it ceased to exist.
Maersk was founded in Denmark in 1904 as Svendborg Steamship Company. Although it has diversified, container transport is still a large part of the business.
Hapag Lloyd is a German company formed in 1970 by the merger of Hamburg-American Line (HAPAG), which dated from 1847, and Norddeutscher Lloyd (NDL) or North German Lloyd (NGL), which was formed in 1857.
NYK Lines (Nippon Yūsen Kabushiki Kaisha) is a Japanese company, founded as Tsukumo Shokai Shipping company in 1870.
MSC (Mediterranean Shipping Company) is a Swiss-Italian company founded in 1970, and still around today.
Hamburg Süd was founded as Hamburg Südamerikanische Dampfschifffahrts-Gesellschaft (Hamburg–South America Steam Shipping Company, or Hamburg South America Line) in 1871. It became part of Maersk in 2017. I have not found a date for when it became Hamburg Süd
Hanjin Shipping was a South Korean company, founded in 1977. It went into bankruptcy in 2017, causing logistic nightmares around the world.
Hoyer are a German company founded in 1946. They are a tanker company, but have a lot of tanker-containers.
Seatrain Lines, officially the Over-Seas Shipping Company, was founded in 1928 in the US, and was intermodal from the start, though standard containers as we know them from 1958. It went bankrupt in 1981, though I presume their containers were in use later than that.
COSCO (China Ocean Shipping Company, Limited) was founded in 1961, a Chinese government agency, and is still active today. it has a subsiduary, COSCO Shipping Development, whose containers have “China Shipping” on them, dating from 1997.
Manchester Liners was founded in 1898, for trading from Manchester on the ship canal. An early adopter of containers in 1968, it struggled financially as ships got bigger, as it was limited by the size of the locks on the canal. It was taken over by C. Y. Tung Group in 1980, and defunct in 1985.
ACL (Atlantic Container Line) arose in a similar style on the North American trade – Cunard were the British partner- but evolved into a stand alone company and are still with us, owned by Grimaldi.
Other companies include: Seawheel, IBC, IFF, CAST, Ellerman Harrison Container Line, Ben Line, Blue Star Line, Cunard (Port Line), Ellerman Lines and the Harrison Line, ACT (Associated Container Transport Australia Ltd). I have not found much about any of them.
Transport of nuclear materials
The TOPS codes for this are FNA/B and FOB, but I cannot find anything about FOB.
This is for spent fuel rods, which makes me wonder how they got the new fuel rods to the reactors in the first place. I know BNFL Springfields had a railway system connected to the mainline between Preston and Blackpool (and I think was steam operated in to the nineties when it closed), so I assume this was used for the new fuel, but cannot find how it was carried.
This traffic existed from the mid-sixties onwards, as there was no spent fuel prior to that. It looks like Flatrol MJ wagons and modified Rectanks were used originally, with purpose-built wagons constructed from around 1970. The original 6 were FNB, thereafter further examples were built in two and three over the next fifteen years as FNAs, with a further 24 built in a single batch in 1988. They number from 550000 to 550050. I am not sure if there was any variation between batches.
Operation was taken over by BNFL in 1994, who set up a company called Direct Rail Services, using five class 20/3 locos, operating from Sellafield. Originally for transport from abroad to Sellafield, from 1998 it also handled domestic traffic (DRS having diversify into other goods the previous year, starting with milk from Penrith to Cricklewood). Ownership of DRS was transferred from BNFL to the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA), when the NDA was created on 1 April 2005.
BNFL proved the safety of the flasks by deliberately driving a class 46 at 100 mph into one in front of journalists. While the loco and wagon were destroyed, the flask suffered only minor superficial damage.
You cannot see the flasks except when they are loaded or unloaded; they are covered in a sliding hood. From ca. 2000 these had the wagon number (not the flask!) in huge numerals on the top (usually last two digits, but I have seen four).
Graham Farish do the FNA wagon.
The super deluxe version is the KUA wagons, two of which were built in 1998 are for transporting spent fuel (and possibly the whole reactor) from submarines. This has the weight distributed across four bogies. They are often seen with two escort coaches, converted from Mark 2a brake coaches, for security personal. I guess when absent, the wagons are empty.
Graham Farish do the escort coaches and RevolutioN the KUA wagons in N gauge (Dapol do a DRS loco).
Other Fxx TOPS codes in use before 1985
FHA – Lowliner Prototype Container Flat Twin-sets (only 4 built) (code later used for Eurospine)
FJB – Freightliner single (from 1984)
FKA – Skip-carrying flat (from 1983)
FMA – Freight flat (for commercial vehicles)
FPA/B – 2-axle Container Wagon
FQA – Cartic-4 Double-Deck Car-Carrying Wagon (from 1983)
FRO – 135T Bogie Transformer Trolley Wagon (from 1983, only 2 built)
FSV – Container Flat (Ex Lowmac) (until 1972)
FZA – Lowliner 2-axle Low Platform Wagon
H: Hopper wagons
Hopper wagons are designed for transporting loose bulk material, including coal, aggregates, gravel and powdered chemicals. The shape of the wagon directs the material to one or more discharge points between the wheels. This requires a bigger investment at the destination, but makes emptying much simpler.
Hopper wagons can be divided into open and closed. Salt will dissolve in rainwater and sand stops being free flowing, so these and many other substance need to be transported in closed hoppers. Coal and aggregates are fine in open hoppers.
It looks like hoppers were much more common for coal trains in the NE of England. This was because the NE Railway liked them and encouraged their use. Sites in that area were set up for it, so even decades after grouping the effects were still apparent.
An air-braked design was built from 1964, HAA, and was still being built in the 80’s. HCA (from 91), HDA (from 82) and HFA (from 92) were all similar. These were used on merry-go-round trains, and required specialist equipment at the destination to unload them; they were generally kept together in a single rake.
Merry-go-round trains were designed to be loaded and unloaded without stopping, and in theory would continue round a loop and back on to the railway system at the end of each operation. In practice most collieries lacked the facilities to do this. It was reckoned that one merry-go-round hopper could replace nearly twenty conventional wagons.
Some were fitted with a top canopy, increasing the capacity somewhat, but few collieries could handle the extra height. Seems to have been more common in Scotland.
Iron ore seems to be the other main commodity transported in hopper wagons (HKV, HJV, HJO). Coke and domestic coal were sometimes carried in specialised hoppers too.
Dapol do a 21t hopper. As far as I can see, only in PO liveries, and the original design, but see the note above.
Graham Farish do a 24 t iron ore hopper, and HAA/HEA/HFA/HSA hoppers.
Peco do MGR hopper.
HTV hoppers from Dapol. They do a kit version that is relatively cheap, and can be easily converted to the rebuilt version by removing three ribs on each side. For N gauge, it is worth grinding coal down to less than 1 mm size for the load.
M: Mineral wagons
Like hoppers, mineral wagons are designed for transporting loose bulk material, but are designed to be emptied from the side or end, rather than the bottom.
The 16t version was very common on BR for carrying coal. These were originally fitted with vacuum brakes (MCV), so painted brown, but the brakes often fouled in the mechanisms at the colliery or (more likely I guess) the destination, so the vast majority were unfitted (MCO).
A diagonal white strip indicated the end with a door. This was used at coal hoists; a wagon would be detached from the train, pushed onto the hoist, raised up, then tilted to about 45 degrees to discharge its contents into a waiting ship. The wagon would then be lowered, and pushed out onto a second line for the empties. All this was done by manual labour and capstans, I would guess (the hoist was usually hydraulic).
The maximum size of a wagon was therefore determined by what the coal hoists could fit, which is why the vast majority of these wagons had such a short wheelbase.
In coal yards, the side doors would be used, together with a man and shovel.
A 21t version was also quite common (MDV, MDO, MDW), with two doors on each side.
Some wagon types were designed to be emptied by tipping the wagon to one side. These so-called tipplers seem to have been more common for PO wagons, so discussed later.
Air braked versions seem not to exist.
Graham Farish do a variety of 16 t wagons and 27 t tipplers
Peco do Butterly steel type wagon (Butterley being the manufacturer), 27 t tippler, 16 t
Revolution do MMA
N: Non-passenger coaches
The full term is NPCCS – non-passenger carrying coaching stock.
There is a very good article on Newspaper trains here. This was an important part of the railways right up to 1986, when News International moved to Wapping. Unions objected to the move, so Murdoch used road transport instead. Mirror Group Newspapers moved to road the next year, and in 1988 BR decided it could no long sustain the traffic and abandoned newspapers altogether (and nowadays the data is sent electronically and printed locally at depots near motorway junctions).
Worth noting that these ran mostly at night. Trains were composed of GUVs and BGs with corridor connections and “Newspaper” on the side, as there was often sorting done en route. There might also be a BSK for the workers. They could also be seen added to passenger workings.
O: Open wagons
This not an area I have looked at much, but will note that open wagons here refers to wagons designed to carry discrete units, such as a pallet of bricks or steels tubes.
Air braked versions, OAA and OBA date from 1971. The OBA appears to have had raised ends. Steel-sided OCA date from early 80’s. Some OBAs were later re-built, for example as OTAs in 1985 for carrying timber.
Graham Farish do OBA and OCA wagons.
Peco do Ferry Open Wagon BR ‘Hybar’, tube wagon, open wagon, ferry tube wagon
P: Private owner, not tanks
Powder tank wagons
Although to me these are tank wagons, I would guess they are considered covered hopper wagons, as they carry powders and are a development of them. Thus they are in P rather than T. The associated hazards may also be a factor.
PDV is a CemFlo wagon, a later development of the PresFlo and PresTwin (which are both in the C group, being owned by BR), with a longer wheelbase and 27 t capacity rather than 22 t. One of the very first wagons I owned in ca. 1975 was a bright yellow Hornby CemFlo.
PCA and PCV were powder tank wagons of various designs, some centre-depressed, some parallel.
PWA were PALVANs (pallet vans). Shellstar Fertilisers (part of Shell) had a set of these from the late sixties, owned by Lloyds and Scottish, for distribution from their plant in Ince, Cheshire, pictures here. Originally curtain-sided, in blue, they were quickly rebuilt with solid sides, and a new brown and cream (or white?) livery. In the first half of the eighties, Shellstar became UKF Fertilisers, and the logo changed, but the livery remained the same. Some wagons appeared with the Royal Bank of Scotland logo, I think in the later eighties, possibly in connection to the ownership by Lloyds and Scottish. Later still UKF was purchased by Kemira Oy, a Finnish company, and the vans became blue again (but a darker shade), with a logo similar to – but not the same – the RBS logo.
Iron ore tipplers
PTA were bogie iron ore tipplers, built between 1972 and 1977. They had a rotating coupling at one end, allowing the wagon to be turned along its length to facilitate unloading. This was signified by painting the entire end of the wagon orange, and marshalling each wagon with the orange at the same end. Outer wagons were of a modified design with conventional couplings fitted, one having rotating couples, the other not (and so no orange end).
The first batch ran from Immingham to Scunthorpe. Later batches were a little different, having three horizontal struts on the ends, rather than two vertical, among other details. The second batch ran from Redcar and Consett, until Consett closed in 1981; they were then sold to Procor and used by ARC and Yeoman for aggregates (the rotating couples were fixed at this point, and no orange ends requires). A third batch ran from Port Talbot to Llanwern, and I believe was notable for being the heaviest trains on BR, the 27 wagons requiring three class 37 locos to pull, and later two class 56. The last batch was built to run from Hunterston to Ravenscraig.
Iron ore is very dense, and apparently wagons were only two thirds filled (so why build the wagons so big?). The only photo I have found where you can see the ore in a wagon is here, I have not been able to establish what it actually is – probably hematite or magnetite.
In 1990 the TOPS code was changed to JTA (outers) or JUA (inners).
More to do
Graham Farish do POA wagons.
Revolution do PFA wagons (container wagons dating from 87), PDV
The N gauge society does the later version of the PTA.
R: Rail department wagons
These are wagons that are not revenue earning, but are not coaches and are not used for permanent way maintenance.
Barrier wagons are used to provide some protection between the train crew and hazardous cargo, such as explosives or flammable gases and liquids. If there is a break van, you would need one at either end (though by this era all hazardous wagons should be fitted). I would guess even empty tankers require a barrier wagon, as the residual will be enough to cause an explosion.
Graham Farish do an RBA barrier wagon (like the prototype, a re-purposed VBA).
Reach wagons allow a loco to reach wagons further away than the loco is allowed to go. For example, the loco might not be permitted inside the fence, but the loading/unloading point is a little way from the gate. The reach wagon makes up the distance.
Match wagons allow a loco with one type of couplings to pull something with another type of couplings. A common use is to couple a loco to an EMU (great example, though out of era, in this photo).
T: Private owner, tanks
These actually have some kind of system. TBx to TEx are bogie wagons, with the letter indicating the gross laden weight (GLW) in a 10 t band, from 70-79 for TBx to over 100 t for TEx. Two axle are similar, going from TRx (20-29 t) to TUx (over 50 t). However, there were a lot of different wagons and markings, due to the nature of the different chemicals, and this is discussed more elsewhere.
Dapol do a three wheel milk tanker, it is unlike the rebuilt version, but may be suitable for pre-1981 milk trains.
Graham Farish do a TEA tank wagon and TTA.
Revolution do a TEA.
PECO do a TTA.
The Graham Farish TEA tanks, repainted and weathered.
The Peco TTA kits, on the left BP phthalate ester wagons, on the right ICI petroleum, with custom transfers, as described here.
BR built hundreds of vans to earlier designs by GWR (Swindon), LMS (Wolverton) and SR (Ashford) around 1949; I suspect all that survived by the TOPS era were in engineering use. The SR vans were notable as they had no diagonal struts, while the LMS had single leaf doors (sliding I think). The GWR and SR had two vents at each end, the LMS just the one. No sign of an LNER design?
The standard van appeared in the early 50s. It had diagonal struts from the top corners to the bottom of the central doors, and a single divider on each side panel. The ends were ribbed metal, with single vents. They had a short wheel-base, were vacuum braked and painted bauxite. Well over 20 000 were built so they were a common sight! They were TOPS code VVV (and several different codes when used by engineers, perhaps reflecting later modifications).
In the early fifies over 13 000 were built with planked walls and doors. In the late 50s, plywood sides and doors were used in a further 5000 or so and planked sides with plywood doors in over 4000 more.
By the earlier eighties they were disappearing from revenue-earning traffic.
A few were converted to be air braked, as VBB.
About 2000 vanwides were built in 62, the final development of the 10′ wheel-base, 12 t wagon. They were built with sliding doors that have an opening 9′ wide, which gave them their name. They had the TOPS codes VWV and VMV (the later for military use).
From 1977 onwards, 550 were converted to air-brakes, for customers who could not handle longer wheel-base wagons, especially the military, and given the designation VEA (in 1984, some were fitted with alarms, and became VFA). Originally in freight maroon, with the Railfreight logo, some (I think those re-built in 1981 or later) appeared in red and grey.
Long wheel-base vans
From 1969, long wheel-base vans were produced with air brakes. They were TOPS VAA, VAB, VBA and VBB. VCA was a later, and less successful version with central doors, rather than full length sliding doors. VDAs were a similar design built from 1975.
VGA and VKA were built from 1982, and look quite different with two doors on each side, each half the length of the wagon, and part of the roof.
These are pallet vans, i.e., they were designed to take a pallet. Early PALVANs had short wheel-bases, and the doors offset to the left. Not sure if they would be loaded from both sides or there were rollers in the floor so a pallet could be loaded, then rolled to the right to allow a second pallet; I guess the former. A few were vacuum braked, but rode poorly and most were soon withdrawn. Most were air braked, TOPS code VPB.
VPV was an alternative style of PALVAN, originally built for Izal traffic (manufacturers of disinfectant and nasty toilet roll). It had a slightly longer wheel-base at 11′, and sliding doors that gave access to the entire wagon on both sides (very much resembling a squashed VQB PALVAN). Withdrawn by 1976.
The rather longer VQB PALVAN was built for Ford in the mid-60s for use between Dagenham and Halewood and later to Swansea. Looks like this stopped around 1980, and some were later used as barrier wagons (ZRW or RBV?) for a few years. A model is available from Peco.
Even before the channel tunnel, BR wagons might run on continent rails, transported by ship. Such wagons had special requirements, and so were dedicated to that use. They were known as ferry vans, and had “Through to the Continent by British Rail” on the side in big letters.
VIX were built in 1962; two-axled but with a long wheel-base. Vacuum-braked, they lasted to around 1980, though a few appeared in RailFreight red and grey (did they get converted to air brakes?). Many were converted to various engineering uses. Some were downgraded, with “Through to the Continent by British Rail” painted over.
GF do VGA and VVV vans (they also do a 1o t insulated van; doubtful they were still around be TOPS)
The Peco box van resembles the GWR design van; they also do the Ford PALVAN. The two railfreight box vans look dubious.
Sonic Models (Revolution) do a VEA
Appendix 1: More on vacuum and air brakes
Appendix 2: A Note About Livestock
British Rails had around 2700 stations capable of handling livestock in the early sixties, but reduced it to about 50 in 1964. Most of the traffic after that was Irish cattle here for fattening from Holyhead and Birkenhead. In 1975 (or 1972?) BR abandoned the traffic altogether. More here.
Appendix 3: A note about the units used for pressure
Sure you can buy milk in pints or litres, and you might describe your height in feet and inches, or in metres, but when it comes to the number of units, pressure wins by a mile. Or 1.61 km.
I would guess it stems from different approaches to the issue.
Relative to atmospheric pressure
An easy way to think about pressure is to compare it to atmospheric pressure, and take that as 1. Even there, we have two units, that are almost – but not quite – the same, that is atmosphere (atm) or bar.
1 atm = 1.01 bar.
The reason there are not quite the same is that 1 atm is defined as 760 mmHg, while 1 bar is defined as 100 kPa, both of which are discussed later.
It is common to measure high pressure (say greater than three or four atmospheres) in atm. Tank wagons designed for carrying gases will usually have a maximum pressure stated in atmospheres.
We also have mbar, with a thousand mbar in 1 bar. This is also one hectopascal (hPa), by the way, which will be discussed later.
1 atm = 1010 mbar.
Meterologists usually use mbar, for example, see here.
Measured with mercury
An easy way to measure pressure is with a U tube containing mercury, and note the difference in height. That difference can then be measured in millimetres or inches. You have the system you want to measure connected to one side of the U. The other side could be under vacuum to give an absolute measure, or to the atmosphere for the relative pressure.
The chemical symbol for mercury in Hg, so the units are mmHg and in Hg or just Hg. One millimeter of mercury is also called 1 Torr.
1 atm = 760 mmHg (by definition) 1 atm = 29.9 in Hg 1 atm = 760 Torr (by definition)
Measured with water
You might also measure pressure using water instead of mercury. Mercury is 13.6 times denser than water, so the height of the water will be 13.6 times greater. To measure a vacuum you need a device over 33 foot high!
1 atm = 407 in H2O
The only time I have heard about using water gauge is BNFL measuring the pressure of fluorine produced from a cell, which I would guess was because it dated from decades ago and the pressure difference was very small, so using water would be rather more accurate than mercury (I cannot remember if they used inches or millimeters).
Force per area
Pressure is, in a technical sense, the force being applied to an area, so this is another approach to pressure. In the imperial system, this is the force in pounds on a square inch, or PSI. In the metric system, it is the force in newtons per square meter, N/m2, which is also called a pascal, Pa. One pascal is pretty small, and it is often more convenient to use kPa, which is a thousand pascals.
1 atm = 14.7 psi 1 atm = 101000 N/m2 1 atm = 101000 Pa 1 atm = 101 kPa 1 bar = 100 kPa (by definition)
One hundred pascal, also called one hectopascal (hPa), is almost one millibar, and I suspect modern weather maps use hectopascals rather than millibars, but they are so close it makes little odds.
Steam pressure in a loco is usually quoted in psi.
Relative or absolute
A further complication is that sometimes it is convenient to describe pressure relative to atmospheric pressure and sometimes relative to a perfect vacuum. When looking at figures for pressure, you need to check carefully which it is. Sometimes “bar” is written as “bara” for the absolute value or “barg” for the relative pressure (bar gauge), but generally it is left to the read to guess for himself!
You may also find with relative pressure, a vacuum is described as a positive or negative number.